Page 207 - Musings 2022
P. 207

“Guilty or not guilty”

                                                      Rahul Balike
                                                     2019A3PS0189P

               Johnathan P. Hunt has been accused of stealing his colleague – Ms. Laura Kenneth’s car. Ms.
               Kenneth  had  apparently  been  collecting  evidence  to  prove  Mr.  Hunt  having  embezzled

               company funds as well as blackmailing his superiors.

               Scene 1: Inside the jury members meeting room, about two hundred square feet large. The
               room is designed in a modern way with large glass windows on the left, right and the back, a

               wooden floor with a simplistic carpet in the middle atop which a round wooden table was
               placed. Six people – four men and two women – are seated around the table, discussing the

               case they need to judge. The three men are seated to the right while the rest are on the left with

               the man closest to the back wall and the women closer to the front. On the table is an assortment
               of papers, transcripts and pictures related to the case. On the back wall is a calendar highlighting

                            th
               the date as 20  of September, 2021. The jury has seen the proceedings of the court and though
               the police have been able to get various pieces of evidences, there is nothing concrete that has

               stuck to Mr. Hunt. And thus, the final decision has been left to the jury.
               Jacob (forward right): As I see it, Hunt definitely has the motive to have committed the crime

               but also has an alibi to prove his innocence. The office system shows that his card was swiped

               to go in but that he only left at about 11 pm, half an hour after her car was actually stolen.
               Harry (middle right): Even his motive is just a baseless allegation. Kenneth ‘says’ that she had

               those incriminating documents, and yes, she is a part of the finance department of her office
               but I have not seen any proof that these documents ever existed!

               Jenna (middle left): We do have proof that they existed. Or more like, a complete lack of any

               financial records in any company transaction involving Mr. Hunt in Ms. Kenneth’s analysis of
               the company’s transactions. I believe this to be a suspiciously convenient lack of records in

               favour of Mr. Hunt.
               Johnson (back left): That just means that Mr. Hunt may have something to hide. Nothing to tie

               him to this case. Just seems to me that Ms. Kenneth is whining that her car was stolen and is

               trying to play the blame game.
               George (back right): I am with Jenna on this. That lack of records on Mr. Hunt’s transaction is

               dubious at best.
               Mary (forward left): I think that Mr. Hunt’s alibi might have been faked.

               Others: What?



                                                                                                      207
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212